Negotiation Blog
Expert CV Writing
Entrepreneurs



"reaching the most satisfactory outcome for ALL concerned"


Games are a Reflection of Behavior

Home Page

Science Of Negotiation

Powerful Persuasion

Negotiate a Better Salary

Resolve Conflict In 6 Steps

4 Negotiating Outcomes

One Stop Financial Solution

Cross Cultural Negotiations

Resolve Business Disputes


You are standing on a small stage yelling, "What's the name of the game?!"

"Win as much as you can!!!" comes roaring back.

"Who's responsible for your score?!"

"I am!!"

The audience is composed of ninety men, all prisoners in a federal maximum security prison.

One more thing - you're a woman.

For three years, Alicia volunteered every Thursday at FCI (Federal Correctional Institute) in Bastrop, Texas-

"I used my skills as a corporate trainer to help these men learn to shift their perspective on themselves and the world."

"Along the way the prisoners taught me as much, perhaps more, than I taught them."

"In my training business, I use games as a way to break down barriers and shift perceptions. What I came to realize is that your behavior in a game is an exaggerated reflection of your behavior in real life."

Games are an opening to behave true to our natures, to react immediately rather than with a careful response. Depending on the other players, we may monitor our behavior less in a game than in the real world, but we aren't acting differently. In a game there are no emotional holds barred.

In a game, we are allowed to be more right brained than logical. After all, "It's only a game."

Saying something is only a game tends to trivialize its importance. Precisely because we view it as trivial, and of no importance, we can give ourselves permission to let our true natures out.

When we floated this idea before a number of colleagues, several of them told us stories of self-discovery. One woman, a very sweet and kind person in "real life", was known as "the enforcer" when she played hockey in school. Another shared that, when she plays a game against total strangers she becomes "brutal" and highly competitive.

So if our true nature comes out in a game, what can we do with that information?

Can we transform situations so that we can be true to our nature? Can we make a game out of real world situations to allow our true nature to flourish? The obvious example is to view business as a game to be won. This implies competition and a winner take all attitude.

Yet Covey and others have told us about creating win-win situations. Is there such a thing as a win-win game - a game where everyone wins, where no one loses? Can you devise a game where you can put your competitive streak toward a larger goal? Can the proverbial pie be made larger? As someone said to me, to transform from "me winning" to "we winning".

What's the name of the game? Win as much as you can!

Who's responsible for your score? I am!

The game Alicia played with the inmates was called "the handshake game". She had them pair up by size, height and weight and explained the rules. "We'll play the game for 45 seconds. You get one point when your hand taps his hip; he gets one point when his hand taps your hip."

The vast majority of the pairs had a combined score of 0 points. A few pairs scored in the 10 - 20 point range.

But one pair scored 260 points.

The high scorers had realized that the name of the game and scoring responsibility did not define a win-lose (or "zero-sum") game. That is, one person did not win at the expense of the other.

Of course, the entire thing was a set-up. Alicia paired them up by size, height and weight to set the expectation that it was an evenly matched contest. She got them chanting to get their excitement up.

And she neglected to tell them that the pair was a team and the team members' scores would be combined.

"Deliberately I didn't tell them they were supposed to cooperate with their partner. I also never told them who the competitors were."

We all know that a "formal" team must cooperate to win. The revelation here was that by cooperating they could maximize their individual scores.

What's the name of the game? Win as much as you can!

Who's responsible for your score? I am!

The rules say nothing about preventing the other person from getting a high score. The pair who "got it" quickly settled into a rhythm of "one for you and one for me". And they could have kept that up for as long as the game ran. Meanwhile, the other teams were struggling and would have exhausted themselves long before the winners did. And, when the few teams who did spot the pair who "got it" there were charges of "cheating" leveled at them. "We saw what they were doing but thought they were cheating or didn't understand the rules."

The cooperation - competition confusion is nicely summed up in the concept called "the prisoners' dilemma". Two people are arrested for a crime and there is enough evidence to put them both in jail for 1 year.

The police keep them isolated from each other and offer each the same deal: "If one of you talks and the other does not, the snitch goes free and the other one gets 3 years. If you both talk, you both get 2 years."

The partners can work together (by staying silent) and both get only a year in jail. By both defecting from the partnership to work with the police they will both get 2 years.

A single defector will go free while the one who cooperated gets 3 years.

The dilemma is formed by pitting trust against greed. The temptation of greed combined with a habit of competition blinds us to a different perspective.

But don't think that only prisoners are subject to this. When Alicia has had groups of corporate executives play this game, they fall into the same behavior pattern as the prisoners. In fact, in some corporate sessions nobody "gets it".

There seems to be a dichotomy between competing and winning. The idea of cooperating to win seems odd. In fact, we see other players complain that the ones who "get it" are cheating!

What you do depends on your view of the game. If the game is seen as a one-time event, why not be brutal - there will be no consequences. But if this event is one in a series, then cooperation is clearly the better long-term strategy, if only because there will be a chance for the other to get even.

In studies of prisoners' dilemma style games (played for points and not reduced jail time) the players eventually settle into a strategy dubbed "tit for tat". Their actions are saying, "If you cooperate last time, I'll cooperate next time. If you defected last time, I'll defect next time."

Using the word "defect" helps us see the shift - the opposite of cooperating (working on the same side) is defecting to the other side.

The desire to compete and the desire to win are not the same.

Game terminology (strategies, tactics, moves, etc.) is often applied to "serious" parts of life. Because the word game has a connotation of triviality, we sometimes bristle at its use to describe the things that mean the most to us.

What if we kept in mind that 'it's all a game' - would we behave differently?

Philosopher James P. Carse writes in the first chapter of Finite and Infinite Games, "There are at least two kinds of games. One could be called finite, the other infinite. A finite game is played for the purpose of winning, and infinite game for the purpose of continuing the play."

The book's subtitle is "A Vision of Life as Play and Possibility." His premise is that a game is about the relationship between the player.

In the book he characterizes two types of players. Finite players play within the rules, infinite players play with the rules. Finite players play to end the game (with their victory), infinite players play to continue the game (by whatever means they see fit). Finite players play to win, infinite players play to keep playing.

The players who "get it" are playing with the rules looking to transform a finite game into an infinite one.

If this article has intrigued you we encourage you to look at the various "games" that you are "playing" and with whom. Who are your "teammates" and what kind of game are you playing? With increased awareness of our behavior, and the behavior of others, we are able to create a "win as much as WE can" mentality.

© Copyright 2004 Alicia Smith Consulting & Training. All Rights Reserved.

This article was written by Alicia Smith as told to John Satta

Alicia Smith is a Coach and Trainer whose specialty is helping business people to Make Money Now. She has taught over 10,000 people how to improve their business bottom lines. To learn more about her courses, products and services, please visit http://www.AliciaSmith.com


MORE RESOURCES:

BBC News

Brazil expects US negotiation proposal to avoid trade war
People's Daily Online
The Brazilian government still awaits a US negotiation proposal about subsidies on US cotton producers to avoid trade sanctions, a Brazilian minister said ...
Picking a fightEconomist
Brazil raises tariffs on US tire exports 100%Modern Tire Dealer
Will Obama Rise to Bush's Standard? Responsible MultilateralismThe American (blog)
BusinessWeek -just-style.com
all 177 news articles »


Budget negotiations set for Monday
Mansfield News Journal
The Monday morning meeting at the commissioners' conference room in the county courthouse will be a preliminary negotiation before the case heads to legal ...

and more »


European Parliament Demands Openness from ACTA Negotiations
ISPReview UK
The new resolution, supported by five major political groups, urges the European Commission (EC) to establish transparency on ACTA by releasing negotiation ...

and more »


CBC.ca

Blair: Face to Face Talks the Only Way
Sky News (blog)
Jerusalem's sovereignty is not up for negotiation and Israelis will continue building in and around the city a regardless. ...
J Street Seeks to Broaden Dialogue on US Policy Toward IsraelVoice of America
US veep spurs Mideast peace process amid settlement flare-upXinhua
US slams new J'lem homes approvalJerusalem Post
Ma'an News Agency -China Daily -Ynetnews
all 3,063 news articles »


Financial Post

Cable and satellite operators take their case to Congress
Los Angeles Times (blog)
Just hours after revealing plans to ask the FCC to change the rules of negotiation between broadcasters and cable operators, a consortium of distributors ...
BC/DC Blog: Cable Looks To FCC For Retrans FixesBroadcasting & Cable
Disney-Cablevision Fight Is Far From the LastNew York Times (blog)
Barton To FCC: Let Cablevision, WABC Work It OutMultichannel News
Crain's New York Business -Television Broadcast -The Big Money
all 2,366 news articles »


NOLA.com

Tribune Opinion: Teachers need a seat at the table
Greeley Tribune
The school board for the district, which covers La Salle, Gilcrest and Platteville, announced it was suspending negotiation-style meetings with its teachers ...
Superintendent candidates narrowed to twoChaska Herald

all 135 news articles »


American Airlines CFO talks about balancing compensation and costs
Fort Worth Star Telegram
The Transport Workers Union, which represents American's ground crew and mechanics employees, is currently in a negotiation session this week with American. ...
American executive says market will dictate wages, benefitsFort Worth Star Telegram

all 75 news articles »


TSN

Wilfork: 'We're very happy staying put'
Boston Globe
I'd never been through (this kind of) negotiation. Certain things were pissing us off, and we're going back-and-forth, and I'm not the type of person that ...
Wilfork: 'It's all about football again'WEEI.com
Patriots Make Vince Wilfork, Stephen Neal Signings OfficialNESN.com
Search Past 7 days ArchivesBoston Herald (blog)
ESPN
all 77 news articles »


Labor union: Negotiations lack vital data
Stockton Record
STOCKTON - Proposals to close the county's $56 million budget gap are stacking up on the negotiation table, but representatives from ...

and more »


Having Right Data Will Help GATS Negotiation Process
Bernama
KUALA LUMPUR, March 10 (Bernama) -- Having the right data will help the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) negotiation process as it is among ...


Google News

Home | Site Map | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | CCL WebServices
© Career Consulting Limited 2010